California Governor Gavin Newsom's recent push to "Trump-proof" the state has drawn criticism, particularly his proposal for $25 million in funding to prepare for legal battles with the incoming presidential administration. Former California Rep. Doug Ose, a Republican, voiced his concerns, characterizing the initiative as a "total waste" of resources that could be better allocated to address pressing issues like homelessness, education, and public safety. He suggested the move was a political maneuver by Newsom, aimed at boosting his own presidential aspirations.
During a special legislative session, the proposal to bolster the state's Justice Department's resources for potential legal clashes with the incoming administration gained traction. The predominantly Democratic legislature is expected to introduce legislation in the coming weeks, which, if enacted, would provide additional funding to the Justice Department and state agencies for legal proceedings related to reproductive rights, environmental regulations, and immigration. It's anticipated the legislation will be signed into law before the inauguration in January.

Governor Newsom has defended his efforts, stating that California plays a crucial role in safeguarding rights and freedoms for all. He emphasized the state's willingness to collaborate with the incoming administration but also its readiness to take action against any perceived overreach or threats to these values. He further asserted that the special session's objective is to position California for success, irrespective of who occupies the White House.

Ose reiterated his criticism, contending that the initiative overlooks the challenges faced by Californians, who are primarily focused on their economic well-being. He cited Newsom's previous actions on issues such as the death penalty, high-speed rail, and K-12 education as examples of ineffective leadership and management.
Newsom anticipates potential conflicts with the incoming administration on various policy fronts. He believes the incoming president's rhetoric and calls for retribution pose a threat to California's progress, and he aims to proactively address these potential challenges.